Ya, but Kane also returned from an ankle injury sooner than expected last year. There's been a couple of injuries that seem like they were managed poorly by Spurs but do we have any reason to think that's true of this one? It sounds like a minor hamstring tweak, not a long-term injury.Magic wrote: ↑27 Oct 2017, 16:32I wouldn't trust Poch's statement about him possibly being ready for Real Madrid. Go back and see what he said about Rose's injury in January. He ended up being out for 9 months. Poch also said Wanyama could maybe be back for the first game of the season. We're now closing in on November and Wanyama is yet to play a single minute of football this season. Spurs are notorious for being misleading with injuries, especially the amount of time someone is out for.
Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
- Turd Ferguson
- FISOhead
- Posts: 943
- Joined: 16 Aug 2015, 03:32
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: 29 Jul 2014, 23:18
- FS Record: Winner of FISO McDonald's Euro 2016 official . league. FPL player since the game began. Successful cash mini league player that usually ends up in profit
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
I'm thinking of bringing in Jesus
Leaving me with kun sterling and Jesus. At least im covered and get 2 out of 3. What can possibly go wrong
Leaving me with kun sterling and Jesus. At least im covered and get 2 out of 3. What can possibly go wrong
- jacksosi
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 4678
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:28
- FS Record: TFF : 87th 06/07 ; FPL 1401st 08/09 ; 5AS champions 21/22 🔫🍸
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Having gone around in circles several times trying to have my cake and eat it using the Kane money, I think I’m just going to do Kane ️ Lacazette. My other plans were racking up hits both to implement and then reverse when he was back.
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: 29 Jul 2014, 23:18
- FS Record: Winner of FISO McDonald's Euro 2016 official . league. FPL player since the game began. Successful cash mini league player that usually ends up in profit
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Only plays 70 mins though . Thought about him myself. Swansea will park a bus too l
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 1650
- Joined: 15 Jan 2010, 00:20
- FS Record: Top 50k last 4 seasons . Mr Consistent
- FPL:
-
- Treebeard
- Posts: 205
- Joined: 30 Oct 2011, 14:32
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Kane . . . Coutinho . . . My team is falling apart at the last minute!!!
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: 29 Jul 2014, 23:18
- FS Record: Winner of FISO McDonald's Euro 2016 official . league. FPL player since the game began. Successful cash mini league player that usually ends up in profit
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Well I expect no less this season
Going with instinct I think ..waiting to see Jesus drop tonight tho
- math!
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 6819
- Joined: 01 Aug 2015, 03:30
- FS Record: Yes
- FPL:
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: 29 Jul 2014, 23:18
- FS Record: Winner of FISO McDonald's Euro 2016 official . league. FPL player since the game began. Successful cash mini league player that usually ends up in profit
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
-
- Wideboy
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 28 Jul 2017, 17:51
- FS Record: I coulda been a contender
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
This just looks like Spurs being prudent really. To me this one is exactly what it says on the tin. Holding in the expectation that he plays against Palace.
If he doesn't, you can buy anybody at a time where it will hopefully be more clear than it is today who the best replacement is.
If he doesn't, you can buy anybody at a time where it will hopefully be more clear than it is today who the best replacement is.
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 1247
- Joined: 29 Jul 2014, 23:18
- FS Record: Winner of FISO McDonald's Euro 2016 official . league. FPL player since the game began. Successful cash mini league player that usually ends up in profit
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
If he doesn't though it's an opportunity wasted this week . Risk of losing value especially if he's out vs realMarkman wrote: ↑27 Oct 2017, 18:53 This just looks like Spurs being prudent really. To me this one is exactly what it says on the tin. Holding in the expectation that he plays against Palace.
If he doesn't, you can buy anybody at a time where it will hopefully be more clear than it is today who the best replacement is.
-
- Wideboy
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 28 Jul 2017, 17:51
- FS Record: I coulda been a contender
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Of course it's all speculation. If I knew Aguero was 100% to start I'd do it. If I had confidence in Lacazette or Moratta and their next fixtures were better I'd do it. However, I know what I'd be thinking if he's declared fit next Friday and I didn't have him.
Just think he'll be back coz I've had a share of hammys myself and I know what his behaviour on Sunday most likely indicates. I wasn't surprised when he was ruled out today.
- baganboy
- Comfortably Dumb(ledore)
- Posts: 5874
- Joined: 05 Aug 2008, 06:59
- FS Record: 2011/12 - 212. 2019/20 - 222.
Altogether 6 top 10Ks. 8 top 20Ks. 9 top 50Ks. - FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
- No Way Jose
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 2782
- Joined: 22 Sep 2017, 10:46
- FS Record: Fluked first season
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Hamstrings have the highest recurrence of any muscle tear, you're right. And you're right re the fatigue factor. You actually have 3 hamstring muscles and the other ones can compensate for minor tears with lower intensity running but typically you risk injury with even a single high intensity sprint and this risk then increases with fatigue. This is how costa was largely managed in games they could afford to, not because he felt pain but often to avoid the risk.Ruth_NZ wrote: ↑27 Oct 2017, 14:35 Just thinking out loud...
The thing with hamstring strains is the threat of recurrence if the muscle is over-exerted too soon or for too long. But that's aggregative, in other words it relates to duration of effort as much as intensity of effort. That's my understanding anyway. For example, when Costa had hamstring issues, Chelsea managed it by only playing him once per week and bringing him off after 70 minutes or so. Isn't No Way Jose a physio? Maybe he could comment?
There's no way for us to know how severe Kane's issue is but it does occur to me that if Spurs manage to get him back for RM on Wednesday then they could easily rest him for Palace next weekend. It's not 'fit' or 'not fit' with hamstrings, it's 'how fit for how long' and perhaps Palace 3 days after RM would be too much? Or they may swerve RM instead, who knows? Or he may not be ready for either.
Anyway, all ifs and buts and maybes. But this does nudge me towards removing Kane. A fully-fit Kane running rampant against Palace is the fear but I guess the worst it would cost me to rectify the move would be 4 points somewhere down the line.
I've played CM the week after a G1 tear after a week of intense treatment but couldn't go past 90% pace without significant pain or kick hard with that leg
There's specific testing for passing him fit to play and there's a chance he would be fit for palace. I'd guess he's 50/50 for palace and he would play 60 at most in that game anyway to be safe and if they are smart with their most important asset then resting him for a very winnable home game or just having him on the bench for emergencies aka agueros rib would be what will happen. This has the added benefit of him possibly missing internationals and resting
As you say though, ifs and buts. He may pass testing and be back for Madrid somehow but this is how I see it panning out
- Ruth_NZ
- Grumpy Old Gorilla
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Thanks very much.
I blame FPL. Seems like I have learned some basics about injuries and that is only from 3 years of needing to figure out what was what with crocked players.
I blame FPL. Seems like I have learned some basics about injuries and that is only from 3 years of needing to figure out what was what with crocked players.
- Jay P
- Treebeard
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 26 Jul 2017, 02:20
- Location: New Zealand
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Is there any chance Poch is playing Jose at his own game? Jose is always playing mind games, claiming players are injured and then they're in the line up come match day... Pochettino is not that type of manager but it would make me so happy if he was doing that.
- Sutter Kane
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 7522
- Joined: 05 Aug 2010, 12:13
- FS Record: Unknown.
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Don't think so. This is a clear rule-out. Mourinho usually casts heavy doubt then surprises us. There is of course a chance and I too would love it to have been cramp. Kane is getting absolutely destroyed in the transfer market. If he's back for GW11, I actually see that as a very good thing.
- Jay P
- Treebeard
- Posts: 154
- Joined: 26 Jul 2017, 02:20
- Location: New Zealand
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
I agree, this seems like a bit of FPL good luck. Anything that dents Kane's ownership is a good thingSutter Kane wrote: ↑27 Oct 2017, 21:34 Kane is getting absolutely destroyed in the transfer market. If he's back for GW11, I actually see that as a very good thing.
- Kuchi
- FISOhead
- Posts: 575
- Joined: 24 May 2017, 11:35
- Location: London
- FS Record: Best: 16/17- 481
- FPL:
- Turd Ferguson
- FISOhead
- Posts: 943
- Joined: 16 Aug 2015, 03:32
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
No price drop for Kane. He’ll probably drop tonight after all the additional transfers out Saturday morning, but if he’s declared fit for Real that might stop the bleeding and he stays at 12.6.
- Billy Bongo
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 12000
- Joined: 21 Jul 2013, 22:18
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Looking at Lukaku home to Newcastle Brighton in 12/13, and Kane ars WBA, then Lukaku seems sensible buyMarkman wrote:This just looks like Spurs being prudent really. To me this one is exactly what it says on the tin. Holding in the expectation that he plays against Palace.
If he doesn't, you can buy anybody at a time where it will hopefully be more clear than it is today who the best replacement is.
-
- Wideboy
- Posts: 87
- Joined: 28 Jul 2017, 17:51
- FS Record: I coulda been a contender
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Billy Bongo wrote: ↑28 Oct 2017, 06:02Looking at Lukaku home to Newcastle Brighton in 12/13, and Kane ars WBA, then Lukaku seems sensible buyMarkman wrote:This just looks like Spurs being prudent really. To me this one is exactly what it says on the tin. Holding in the expectation that he plays against Palace.
If he doesn't, you can buy anybody at a time where it will hopefully be more clear than it is today who the best replacement is.
Yeah I'm holding Lukaku for that reason anyway. There could be a lot of folks going into that period wanting to bring in Kane and Lukaku.
- TheBigLewandowski
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 4646
- Joined: 25 Jul 2016, 15:04
- FS Record: OR 1,259 2016/17
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Will there be many that will just bench him this week?
I have to decide whether to play Carroll or Naughton away at Arsenal, so not an ideal fixture for Swansea.
I just don't see the point in taking a hit to remove him?
I have to decide whether to play Carroll or Naughton away at Arsenal, so not an ideal fixture for Swansea.
I just don't see the point in taking a hit to remove him?
-
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 5479
- Joined: 06 Feb 2016, 09:48
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Would have held until he dropped in less than a day. Lord knows how far he'll drop based on the possibility of him getting another rest next weekend.
- TopMarx
- Treebeard
- Posts: 139
- Joined: 06 Apr 2017, 10:01
- FS Record: Two top 5k finishes in last five seasons
- FPL:
- Contact:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
great info, thank youNo Way Jose wrote: ↑27 Oct 2017, 21:02 Hamstrings have the highest recurrence of any muscle tear, you're right. And you're right re the fatigue factor. You actually have 3 hamstring muscles and the other ones can compensate for minor tears with lower intensity running but typically you risk injury with even a single high intensity sprint and this risk then increases with fatigue. This is how costa was largely managed in games they could afford to, not because he felt pain but often to avoid the risk.
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 3170
- Joined: 28 Aug 2015, 15:35
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Spurs looked no better then average today. Pretty poor attacking wise. Think as soon as Kane is healed he will be straight back, even against an awful palace. They can't afford not to play him or ease him back if fit. Glad I kept him.
- Sammy the Crab
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 5719
- Joined: 14 Apr 2012, 21:58
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
FPL now have him at 25%. Is this a guess or has Poch made a comment along these lines?
- Mav3rick
- FISO Jedi Knight
- Posts: 20858
- Joined: 20 Jul 2009, 20:35
- FS Record: FPL: 1082, 1201, 1800, 10203
The stats are dark and full of errors.
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Their flags are pretty arbitrary, it's probably just that he's not definitely out yet, so they gave him an orange flag.
- Joshhua
- Red & Blue Braces
- Posts: 481
- Joined: 18 Sep 2017, 20:57
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
He is a doubt for Real Madrid game. Maybe Spurs loosing today is not bad for Kane, as they will have to bounce back against Palace and looking how they struggled against every team sitting back at Wembley, not sure Poch will see it as an easy game. Of course, if Kane can play in the first place.
Thinking now selling him was a good idea, as even if he can play, is it wise to captain him under these circumstances? Think there is a fair chance that he could be injured in the first 10 minutes or taken off early after 60 minutes as a precaution.
Thinking now selling him was a good idea, as even if he can play, is it wise to captain him under these circumstances? Think there is a fair chance that he could be injured in the first 10 minutes or taken off early after 60 minutes as a precaution.
- Ruth_NZ
- Grumpy Old Gorilla
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46
- FPL:
Re: Harry Kane’s GW10 hammy
Joshhua wrote: He is a doubt for Real Madrid game. Maybe Spurs loosing today is not bad for Kane, as they will have to bounce back against Palace and looking how they struggled against every team sitting back at Wembley, not sure Poch will see it as an easy game. Of course, if Kane can play in the first place.
Thinking now selling him was a good idea, as even if he can play, is it wise to captain him under these circumstances? Think there is a fair chance that he could be injured in the first 10 minutes or taken off early after 60 minutes as a precaution.
Yep. I did sell him (and I damned well hope he drops tonight). But I'm now thinking I may wait till GW12 to bring him back. There has to be a chance that Pochettino plays safe with him against Palace, even if he plays against RM.
View Latest: 1 Day View Your posts