To see less ads Register or Login ----- Daily Fantasy Sports games 18+

DGW Thread

A Fantasy Football forum for news on fantasy football games run by the Premierleague (FPL).
Post Reply
User avatar
Stemania
FISO Jedi Knight
Posts: 20448
Joined: 27 Aug 2006, 11:54
Location: On the Iron Throne of xG, the seat of The Crown Prince of the Stat Perverts. Or if not, in the STC!
FS Record: Best: TFF 321st. FPL 129th. FFS Career HoF Peak 2nd (Live 1st). Ability since lost.

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Stemania »

Thanks for the links again MoSe.

This page of the docs linked looks particularly useful with the percentage chance of each fixture taking place (based on bookies odds). Currently:

GW28Fixture Blank%
Chelsea vs Watford 75.84%
Southampton vs Man United 71.51%
Liverpool vs Burnley 71.51%
Crystal Palace vs Tottenham 69.49%
Arsenal vs Leicester 64.66%
Man City vs Stoke 51.10%
Middlesbrough vs Sunderland 42.59%
Hull vs Swansea 17.03%
Everton vs West Brom 0%
Bournemouth vs West Ham 0%

with 5 'projected' blanks currently. Obviously it will get a massive overhaul when the draw for the next round is made.

Is it Jarvish(?) from FFS that we should credit?

User avatar
Ruth_NZ
Grumpy Old Gorilla
Posts: 9156
Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Ruth_NZ »

Southampton v Arsenal postponed GW26. Will it be played the midweek following (so still in GW26)? Maybe we'll know before the next gameweek deadline. But I'm kind of glad only to have Sanchez to worry about right now.

User avatar
I Am Ville
Red & Blue Braces
Posts: 349
Joined: 05 Sep 2016, 21:48
FS Record: FPL Best 5,025 (16/17)

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by I Am Ville »

Easy benching decision for one week with just sanchez. I am in same boat.

User avatar
Mo Bot
Dumbledore
Posts: 7212
Joined: 15 Oct 2005, 13:59
FS Record: Inaugural Last Man Standing. FISO Fantasy Eurovision champ 2012. World #1 in UFPL for a whole week

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Mo Bot »

Ruth_NZ wrote:Southampton v Arsenal postponed GW26. Will it be played the midweek following (so still in GW26)? Maybe we'll know before the next gameweek deadline. But I'm kind of glad only to have Sanchez to worry about right now.
Seeing as they play each other this weekend, one of them will qualify for the next round. I believe the midweek following GW26 is earmarked for FA cup 5th round replays so it might not be arranged until much later. I could be talking out of my backside of course.....

Finisher1
Dumbledore
Posts: 7159
Joined: 05 Mar 2013, 10:10

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Finisher1 »

Sanchez has a blank GW26?

YES PLEASE!!!!!!!!!!

#SayNoToSanchez

OIEIAO
FISOhead
Posts: 981
Joined: 27 Aug 2014, 22:13

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by OIEIAO »

I have sanchez and Giroud and 2 from man u (accidental rhyme).

Looking to switch Giroud after the Watford game which was kind of the plan already.

It may have been highlighted but Everton are already assured not to blank in either Gw26 or 28 so those buying their players for their favorable fixtures can do so with confidence.
Last edited by OIEIAO on 26 Jan 2017, 11:35, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ruth_NZ
Grumpy Old Gorilla
Posts: 9156
Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Ruth_NZ »

Mo Bot wrote:
Ruth_NZ wrote:Southampton v Arsenal postponed GW26. Will it be played the midweek following (so still in GW26)? Maybe we'll know before the next gameweek deadline. But I'm kind of glad only to have Sanchez to worry about right now.
Seeing as they play each other this weekend, one of them will qualify for the next round. I believe the midweek following GW26 is earmarked for FA cup 5th round replays so it might not be arranged until much later. I could be talking out of my backside of course.....
Impossible to know. They could re-schedule for GW26 midweek and then postpone again if the slot is needed for a FA Cup replay. They could go for GW34 (which also runs the same risk). They could do nothing and then get into knots later on (as they did last season). Who can tell? I don't think they have the sharpest tools in the box dealing with these issues to be honest. :?

cesc408
Grumpy Old Man
Posts: 3170
Joined: 28 Aug 2015, 15:35

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by cesc408 »

I can see some people not wanting to hold, with a possible run of:

Gw26 Blank
Gw27 Lpool A
Gw28 Blank
Gw29 WBA A
Gw30 Man City H

It's not so much the fixtures that are set, more the possibility of 2 blanks in 3

User avatar
Joccki_10
Grumpy Old Joker
Posts: 11429
Joined: 26 Dec 2015, 11:20
FS Record: 16/17: 55 OR, 1 FISO Forum, 1 NLD and FISO Cup Winner

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Joccki_10 »

I expect Sanchez :arrow: Hazard in GW26 to be a very popular transfer.

User avatar
MoSe
Dumbledore
Posts: 9562
Joined: 10 Sep 2014, 12:25
Location: next door S.Siro stadium
FS Record: FISODAS CUP Winner Season 25
FISO H2H Winner: 15/16 Div2 - 16/17 Div1
FISO Mirror: 16/17 PL Winner

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by MoSe »

Ruth_NZ wrote:They could re-schedule for GW26 midweek and then postpone again if the slot is needed for a FA Cup replay.
yeah, I had suggested/inquired earlier whether a "provisional" re-schedule was something to consider, or out of FA habits...
By the same rationale, couldn't they (in theory) provisionally bring it forward to Wed Feb 8th, 13 days from now, pending the need of a R4 replay?
Or is it too close anyway?

User avatar
Aldershot Rejects
Dumbledore
Posts: 9597
Joined: 03 Aug 2011, 17:15
Location: Kent
FS Record: 5th Metro (2010-11); 146 - Sky (2015-16); 218 - Sky (2014-15); 386 - Sky (2020-21); 636 - FPL (2017-18); last 16 Sky Cup (2018-19)

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Aldershot Rejects »

cesc408 wrote:I can see some people not wanting to hold, with a possible run of:

Gw26 Blank
Gw27 Lpool A
Gw28 Blank
Gw29 WBA A
Gw30 Man City H

It's not so much the fixtures that are set, more the possibility of 2 blanks in 3
I've been looking at that and wondering whether to temporarily unload him.

User avatar
Ruth_NZ
Grumpy Old Gorilla
Posts: 9156
Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Ruth_NZ »

MoSe wrote:
Ruth_NZ wrote:They could re-schedule for GW26 midweek and then postpone again if the slot is needed for a FA Cup replay.
Yeah, I had suggested/inquired earlier whether a "provisional" re-schedule was something to consider, or out of FA habits...
By the same rationale, couldn't they (in theory) provisionally bring it forward to Wed Feb 8th, 13 days from now, pending the need of a R4 replay?
Or is it too close anyway?
13 days is too close under normal circumstances. If we don't hear tomorrow (Friday) then that's pretty much out I think. The most likely outcome is that they will do nothing and wait. And then end up having to pay another fine to UEFA. :shock:
Aldershot Rejects wrote:
cesc408 wrote:It's not so much the fixtures that are set, more the possibility of 2 blanks in 3
I've been looking at that and wondering whether to temporarily unload him.
Yep. Purchase price will make a difference here. I made a big mistake selling Sanchez back in GW13 when I thought he was an injury risk and he wasn't. Cost me 37 points in 2 weeks and 0.4m more to bring him back. :oops: But that could now help me because I bought at 11.5m. He'd be an easy sell with blanks GW26 & 28 (if that happens).

User avatar
Vsz
Grumpy Old Man
Posts: 2092
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:34
Location: Spain
FS Record: Won lots of cash leagues and was once, very briefly, top of TFF. Finished 15th too. Various top 5K and 10K FPL finishes

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Vsz »

Ruth_NZ wrote:
MoSe wrote:
Ruth_NZ wrote:They could re-schedule for GW26 midweek and then postpone again if the slot is needed for a FA Cup replay.
Yeah, I had suggested/inquired earlier whether a "provisional" re-schedule was something to consider, or out of FA habits...
By the same rationale, couldn't they (in theory) provisionally bring it forward to Wed Feb 8th, 13 days from now, pending the need of a R4 replay?
Or is it too close anyway?
13 days is too close under normal circumstances. If we don't hear tomorrow (Friday) then that's pretty much out I think. The most likely outcome is that they will do nothing and wait. And then end up having to pay another fine to UEFA. :shock:
Aldershot Rejects wrote:
cesc408 wrote:It's not so much the fixtures that are set, more the possibility of 2 blanks in 3
I've been looking at that and wondering whether to temporarily unload him.
Yep. Purchase price will make a difference here. I made a big mistake selling Sanchez back in GW13 when I thought he was an injury risk and he wasn't. Cost me 37 points in 2 weeks and 0.4m more to bring him back. :oops: But that could now help me because I bought at 11.5m. He'd be an easy sell with blanks GW26 & 28 (if that happens).
I'm thinking I'll ditch Sanchez and Giroud after the Watford game then and probably get the former back in for the DGW's later in the season.

KDB and Lukaku on my radar.

cesc408
Grumpy Old Man
Posts: 3170
Joined: 28 Aug 2015, 15:35

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by cesc408 »

And now UTD have a blank GW26 (as most expected) and possibly a blank GW28. Do we expect people to jump off Ibra and go for Costa/Kane/Lukaku (whichever they don't have) ?

Can sense lots of 343 similar teams fast approaching

KingMaalik
Wideboy
Posts: 54
Joined: 07 Jan 2015, 14:35

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by KingMaalik »

bought Alexis at 10.9, can't and won't sell him...

User avatar
Aldershot Rejects
Dumbledore
Posts: 9597
Joined: 03 Aug 2011, 17:15
Location: Kent
FS Record: 5th Metro (2010-11); 146 - Sky (2015-16); 218 - Sky (2014-15); 386 - Sky (2020-21); 636 - FPL (2017-18); last 16 Sky Cup (2018-19)

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Aldershot Rejects »

cesc408 wrote:And now UTD have a blank GW26 (as most expected) and possibly a blank GW28. Do we expect people to jump off Ibra and go for Costa/Kane/Lukaku (whichever they don't have) ?

Can sense lots of 343 similar teams fast approaching
I will probably keep one of Sanchez or Ibra and ditch the other.

OIEIAO
FISOhead
Posts: 981
Joined: 27 Aug 2014, 22:13

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by OIEIAO »

I will probably try and have max 3 blanking outfield players in week 26 (have 4 right now) and bench them all. Sanchez and Ibta have gone up 0.5 and 0.4 since I bought and I don't fancy re arranging everything to sell and re buy either, let alone both, if they still look like season keepers.

Week 28 could be a nightmare but may still try and struggle through.

User avatar
Mo Bot
Dumbledore
Posts: 7212
Joined: 15 Oct 2005, 13:59
FS Record: Inaugural Last Man Standing. FISO Fantasy Eurovision champ 2012. World #1 in UFPL for a whole week

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Mo Bot »

Aldershot Rejects wrote:
cesc408 wrote:And now UTD have a blank GW26 (as most expected) and possibly a blank GW28. Do we expect people to jump off Ibra and go for Costa/Kane/Lukaku (whichever they don't have) ?

Can sense lots of 343 similar teams fast approaching
I will probably keep one of Sanchez or Ibra and ditch the other.
A long way to go but I would ditch Sanchez over Ibra simply for the GW27 game. I'd much rather have Zlatan in my team for Bou (H) than not.

User avatar
Ruth_NZ
Grumpy Old Gorilla
Posts: 9156
Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Ruth_NZ »

Some games to look out for this weekend:

Palace v City - a Palace win would mean that City v Stoke can go ahead in GW28
Fulham v Hull - a Fulham win would mean Hull v Swansea is confirmed GW28

Accrington Stanley winning at Boro would also confirm a GW28 game but that seems rather unlikely.

The 5th round of the FA Cup is in GW25 and we really won't have a clear picture till then. This weekend doesn't look likely to help much.

User avatar
Mo Bot
Dumbledore
Posts: 7212
Joined: 15 Oct 2005, 13:59
FS Record: Inaugural Last Man Standing. FISO Fantasy Eurovision champ 2012. World #1 in UFPL for a whole week

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Mo Bot »

Indeed. I think the most useful part of the weekend will be the 5th round draw. At least we can make plans based on likely outcomes then.

User avatar
Stemania
FISO Jedi Knight
Posts: 20448
Joined: 27 Aug 2006, 11:54
Location: On the Iron Throne of xG, the seat of The Crown Prince of the Stat Perverts. Or if not, in the STC!
FS Record: Best: TFF 321st. FPL 129th. FFS Career HoF Peak 2nd (Live 1st). Ability since lost.

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Stemania »

Looking at MoSe's spreadsheet again the big difference to last year looks to be that we won't have a blank between the two DGWs. The FA Cup semis are in GW34 so presumably any team getting that far will have their rearranged games midweek in GW34 (simply retaining their SGW) and then have a DGW37. So it looks to me on initial inspection that we should have a slightly smaller than usual DGW34, with the teams in the FA Cup semis having at only one DGW out of GW34/37 rather than the 2-blank-2 from last year.

I suspect that's going to make it much easier to navigate through the whole period compared to last year where we couldn't pick too many players in DGW34 that weren't playing in GW35. :D

It's looking pretty likely that Arsenal, Southampton and both Manchester teams are blank in both GWs 26 & 28 (unless they get their arse in gear and arrange some for GW26 midweek) - that's going to cause fun and games later as any of those four getting through to the semi-final could potentially have 3 games to rearrange and only 2 slots (midweeks GW34/37). Maybe we can half-expect a very small third DGW in, say GW33 like Everton-Palace again?

User avatar
Ruth_NZ
Grumpy Old Gorilla
Posts: 9156
Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Ruth_NZ »

Stemania wrote:The FA Cup semis are in GW34 so presumably any team getting that far will have their rearranged games midweek in GW34 (simply retaining their SGW) and then have a DGW37. So it looks to me on initial inspection that we should have a slightly smaller than usual DGW34, with the teams in the FA Cup semis having at only one DGW out of GW34/37 rather than the 2-blank-2 from last year. I suspect that's going to make it much easier to navigate through the whole period compared to last year where we couldn't pick too many players in DGW34 that weren't playing in GW35. :D
Yes. DGW34 will almost certainly involve less teams than it did last season. It could conceivably be as few as 6 or 8 (as I referred to earlier in the thread). Meaning more commonality of DGW teams and possibly also less need for a wildcard.

In all honesty there is only one decision that I think will make much difference around DGW time this season. And that will be who you triple-captain and when. That is likely to be where the biggest swings occur.

User avatar
scarletjim
Dumbledore
Posts: 6908
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:32

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by scarletjim »

KingMaalik wrote:bought Alexis at 10.9, can't and won't sell him...
Slightly off topic I know, but I'm not sure that logic applies the same way this season as it might have in previous seasons. If you sold now, it would be at £11.4m. If Sanchez has a 5-GW period with 2 blanks, and no 'obvious captain' games, I can see him falling £0.5m or thereabouts during that period. If he falls only £0.4m, then you'd be losing just £0.1m when you buy him back. If he falls more, you'd actually be in profit when you buy him back. Then of course you have the opportunity cost of tying up £11.4m for 5 GWs that could be used elsewhere in your squad...

I'm not 100% sure yet, but I (having also bought at £10.9m) will almost certainly sell if he has those 2 blanks. Personally, having also Ibra, Bellarin, Redmond and Rodriguez (don't ask how I ended up with two Southampton mids...) it's going to be very much a case of damage-limitation during that period, and I may end up keeping someone through that period more due to lack of transfers than any genuine desire to keep them. But in the case of someone like Ibra, who has a great fixture in GW27, that might be a blessing in disguise. (And of course Ibra would be the one to keep, given the fixtures of all those players generally after GW25).

I'll be interested to see what happens in terms of price falls generally when big players have blanks, especially 2 blanks in 3 GWs - will we see falls of £0.5m / £0.6m maybe? Or will people perhaps all pile out at the same time leaving some falls taking place with 400%+ of the threshold? Anyway, important not to obsess too much about those - points are what determines our league positions after all, not money! :)

User avatar
blahblah
FISO Viscount
Posts: 108831
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:46
Location: .. he thinks that he knows something which he doesn't, whereas I am quite concious of my ignorance.

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by blahblah »

scarletjim wrote:opportunity cost
There's no such thing as a free lunch :wink:

User avatar
NYHammer
Wideboy
Posts: 60
Joined: 11 Sep 2009, 01:37
FS Record: Not bad, could be better

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by NYHammer »

Ruth_NZ wrote:
Stemania wrote:The FA Cup semis are in GW34 so presumably any team getting that far will have their rearranged games midweek in GW34 (simply retaining their SGW) and then have a DGW37. So it looks to me on initial inspection that we should have a slightly smaller than usual DGW34, with the teams in the FA Cup semis having at only one DGW out of GW34/37 rather than the 2-blank-2 from last year. I suspect that's going to make it much easier to navigate through the whole period compared to last year where we couldn't pick too many players in DGW34 that weren't playing in GW35. :D
Yes. DGW34 will almost certainly involve less teams than it did last season. It could conceivably be as few as 6 or 8 (as I referred to earlier in the thread). Meaning more commonality of DGW teams and possibly also less need for a wildcard.

In all honesty there is only one decision that I think will make much difference around DGW time this season. And that will be who you triple-captain and when. That is likely to be where the biggest swings occur.

Triple captain is clearly important but isn't bench boost even bigger? 4 additional players for a double game week represents 8 additional chances to score..triple captain in a double game week is 2 (as you have a captain anyway).

User avatar
scarletjim
Dumbledore
Posts: 6908
Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:32

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by scarletjim »

NYHammer wrote:
Ruth_NZ wrote:
Stemania wrote:The FA Cup semis are in GW34 so presumably any team getting that far will have their rearranged games midweek in GW34 (simply retaining their SGW) and then have a DGW37. So it looks to me on initial inspection that we should have a slightly smaller than usual DGW34, with the teams in the FA Cup semis having at only one DGW out of GW34/37 rather than the 2-blank-2 from last year. I suspect that's going to make it much easier to navigate through the whole period compared to last year where we couldn't pick too many players in DGW34 that weren't playing in GW35. :D
Yes. DGW34 will almost certainly involve less teams than it did last season. It could conceivably be as few as 6 or 8 (as I referred to earlier in the thread). Meaning more commonality of DGW teams and possibly also less need for a wildcard.

In all honesty there is only one decision that I think will make much difference around DGW time this season. And that will be who you triple-captain and when. That is likely to be where the biggest swings occur.

Triple captain is clearly important but isn't bench boost even bigger? 4 additional players for a double game week represents 8 additional chances to score..triple captain in a double game week is 2 (as you have a captain anyway).
Yes but the 2 are much bigger chances of scoring. Look how often your captain gets more points than all of your subs put together - quite often I'd imagine. ;)

User avatar
Mo Bot
Dumbledore
Posts: 7212
Joined: 15 Oct 2005, 13:59
FS Record: Inaugural Last Man Standing. FISO Fantasy Eurovision champ 2012. World #1 in UFPL for a whole week

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Mo Bot »

DGWs might not be much of an issue if the Premier League teams keep getting thrashed in the FA Cup.

User avatar
Stemania
FISO Jedi Knight
Posts: 20448
Joined: 27 Aug 2006, 11:54
Location: On the Iron Throne of xG, the seat of The Crown Prince of the Stat Perverts. Or if not, in the STC!
FS Record: Best: TFF 321st. FPL 129th. FFS Career HoF Peak 2nd (Live 1st). Ability since lost.

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Stemania »

Palace vs Spurs in GW28 looking surprisingly unendangered at HT. :shock:

User avatar
Stemania
FISO Jedi Knight
Posts: 20448
Joined: 27 Aug 2006, 11:54
Location: On the Iron Throne of xG, the seat of The Crown Prince of the Stat Perverts. Or if not, in the STC!
FS Record: Best: TFF 321st. FPL 129th. FFS Career HoF Peak 2nd (Live 1st). Ability since lost.

Re: RE: Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Stemania »

Well that was exciting. So i believe right now we have

GW28 Most Likely Blanks
Arsenal vs Leicester (Ars in, Lei tbd)
Chelsea vs Watford (Che in, Wat tbd)
Man City vs Stoke (Man in, Sto out)
Crystal Palace vs Tottenham (Pal out, Tot in)
Middlesbrough vs Sunderland (Mid in, Sun out)
Liverpool vs Burnley (Liv out, Bur in)

(No more info on those possible till after Gw25)

GW28 To Be Determined
Southampton vs Man United (Both tbd)
Hull vs Swansea (Hull tbd, Swa out)

GW28 On
Everton vs West Brom
Bournemouth vs West Ham

Edit: Arsenal game updated after Sat evening game

User avatar
Aldershot Rejects
Dumbledore
Posts: 9597
Joined: 03 Aug 2011, 17:15
Location: Kent
FS Record: 5th Metro (2010-11); 146 - Sky (2015-16); 218 - Sky (2014-15); 386 - Sky (2020-21); 636 - FPL (2017-18); last 16 Sky Cup (2018-19)

Re: DGW Early Scan

Post by Aldershot Rejects »

About the only thing that has changed after today is that Liverpool v Crystal Palace is definitely on for GW34.

View Latest: 1 Day View Your posts
Post Reply

Return to “Fantasy PremierLeague.com (FPL)”