I suggested them off the cuff as a better option than King, I'm not interested in any of them as I have a 4.5M bench warmer in midfield (currently Capoue) and 6, 7.5, 8 & 10 on the pitch. If I were looking for a 5-5.5M midfielder to play I would have to look into who was the best prospect (If indeed there is one) but I'm not so I haven't.Mav3rick wrote:You're not wrong in your facts, but I don't think you can really advocate that as a sensible strategy for an FPL team.Weisenwolf wrote: I'm on my second bottle of wine so I may be well off here but from my seat they are both nailed on and they are the 11th & 12th highest scoring midfielders in the game; hardly bench fodder. They both may rise in value this week and they are cheaper to boot. Everton and Spurs are also better teams than Bournemouth and Everton in particular have excellent fixtures.
There's no way I'd want Wanayama starting in my first XI, and without checking I don't even know if Barry is a consistent starter for Everton.
Price changes correlate to earned points, but don't necessarily indicate quality. There are a large number of underlying stats to look at before an FPL manager should be considering Barry as a 4th midfield pick.
I've not done this yet, but I would highly recommend going to FFS, StatsZone or whoscored and checking the figures on players like Ramirez, Snodgrass or King before making any conclusions.
Appreciate that you're probably focussed on TV, but that will follow if you can predict the points.
And yes I do have an eye towards TV for the first few weeks but not at any cost, I don't have anyone in my team who is there for no purpose than to increase in price and to hell with points, that would be madness.