That assumes no more hits for the rest of the season. Go on, I dare youWeisenwolf wrote:Yes 64 points in hits to make up over the remaining 24 games. Will my additional funds equate to more than 3 points per week? We shall see.The Catman wrote:Haha, your points hits are about three times my score so far this week.....keep it upWeisenwolf wrote:Shame my points aren'tPaulista wrote:Your team value is incredible.Weisenwolf wrote:Kane is over +300%
Really ? Don't see why, ok 3 points this week but you can't score points every weekMav3rick wrote:Such a turn around for Walcott, from most transferred in to most transferred out in one week!
I suppose it's people using their Aguero cash to upgrade to Sanchez, or moving sideways to Eriksen.fantasyfaz wrote:Really ? Don't see why, ok 3 points this week but you can't score points every weekMav3rick wrote:Such a turn around for Walcott, from most transferred in to most transferred out in one week!
Oh my giddy aunt, no more hits, 24 weeks, Aggghhhh I can't do itThe Catman wrote:That assumes no more hits for the rest of the season. Go on, I dare youWeisenwolf wrote:Yes 64 points in hits to make up over the remaining 24 games. Will my additional funds equate to more than 3 points per week? We shall see.The Catman wrote:Haha, your points hits are about three times my score so far this week.....keep it upWeisenwolf wrote:Shame my points aren'tPaulista wrote:Your team value is incredible.Weisenwolf wrote:Kane is over +300%
) and a couple were to be playing 11. Mathematically taking a hit (-4) to bring in a playing player (minimum +2 usually) when the sold is about to go down in value and the purchased up in value and the alternative is a man down is usually a good decision 
He may well drop, but not tonight. In fact, the way people are thrashing around to get Sanchez I wouldn't necessarily rule out a 0.2 drop by next GW as he's shedding previous rises which we've seen being lost rapidly on other players.I Am Ville wrote:Any chance walcott might drop? I need him to drop .1 to squeeze him in. Cannot afford him at 8.0
https://fpldiscovery.wordpress.com/2016 ... -and-statsWeisenwolf wrote: he can't be in over 1 1/2 million dormant teams.
) IMav3rick wrote:He may well drop, but not tonight. In fact, the way people are thrashing around to get Sanchez I wouldn't necessarily rule out a 0.2 drop by next GW as he's shedding previous rises which we've seen being lost rapidly on other players.I Am Ville wrote:Any chance walcott might drop? I need him to drop .1 to squeeze him in. Cannot afford him at 8.0
In terms of numbers he's done about -12k today according to CtC and is about 10% to a drop.
Yeah think i am doubling up on Arsenal from thenWeisenwolf wrote:He's £8M and he was better value at £7.5M
Be good from week 18 especially if he does drop a couple of times
Firmino hits a bad run at about that time too, but Perez is starting to be a threat to Walcott's game time? Or is he more likely to play from the other flank?I Am Ville wrote:Yeah think i am doubling up on Arsenal from thenWeisenwolf wrote:He's £8M and he was better value at £7.5M
Be good from week 18 especially if he does drop a couple of times
Me too; Wally is 2/3 if the way to a drop which would be handy.I Am Ville wrote:Yeah think i am doubling up on Arsenal from thenWeisenwolf wrote:He's £8M and he was better value at £7.5M
Be good from week 18 especially if he does drop a couple of times
Didn't drop yesterday; still hovering.Weisenwolf wrote:I didn't check. Aguero is in the drop zone now
He's still flagged.....I'm not a fan of meetings but FPL towers really need to have one, this flagging is incoherent, it's not good for the game.Mav3rick wrote:Heaton could/should be unflagged but if he's not he may very well drop tomorrow night.
Those rises are really going to bite me in the arse when I feel I need to have him from GW18 and onwards.Weisenwolf wrote:Sanchez who is heading for the glorious 3rd rise.
I think Mark (of FFS) addressed this a few weeks ago. My understanding (if I remember rightly, in leu of the actual post in their comments system) is that FFS have no control at all, but FFS are aware that FPL do use them as one of many resourses for flagging-related updates. The precise system apparently remains a mystery even to the big cheeses at FFS though.Mav3rick wrote:As far as I know, it's FFS who control the flagging, or at least, FPL take their lead from FFS.
No, Mark as good as admitted that he is advising FPL on flags. The point he was making was that he has no influence on price movements and doesn't know the ins and outs of how they work.Stemania wrote:I think Mark (of FFS) addressed this a few weeks ago. My understanding (if I remember rightly, in leu of the actual post in their comments system) is that FFS have no control at all, but FFS are aware that FPL do use them as one of many resourses for flagging-related updates. The precise system apparently remains a mystery even to the big cheeses at FFS though.Mav3rick wrote:As far as I know, it's FFS who control the flagging, or at least, FPL take their lead from FFS.
Sorry to hear that Joccki; bet it won't hurt as much as buying back Costa at £1.1M more than I paid for the arrogant sod the first time roundJoccki_10 wrote:Those rises are really going to bite me in the arse when I feel I need to have him from GW18 and onwards.Weisenwolf wrote:Sanchez who is heading for the glorious 3rd rise.
Yeah, I don't doubt that FFS send regular updates to FPL as a courtousy, but I seem to remember something like Mark recently saying "I know we’re a source they've use for at least six seasons" so at least it doesn't seem to be an official link.Mav3rick wrote:Well, FFS may claim that FPL use other resources and that FFS have no direct control, but I think I'd struggle to find mainstream examples of a player being flagged or unflagged without an accompanying tweet from FFS.
Perhaps FPL just read the same news sources but all that controversy around the international injuries and flags seemed to originate from dubious official sources yet still ended up with flagging after FFS reported the players as doubtful.
There's definitely a synergy between the two and I'd actually be quite surprised if FPL use any source other that FFS. I'm not saying FFS deliberately mislead, but I think the onus is squarely on them to get the flagging as accurate as possible since it clearly is used heavily, if not solely, by FPL.
It's an adjustment you can assimilate with ease IMHI. Bit of a bigger it's not apparent until mid seasoning and a shame FPL towers can't give us the heads up but hey-ho. It makes taking hits more likely and I wonder how good or bad that is?Mav3rick wrote:eff price drops - 99% to a drop now.
Would like time to think, and address issues next week with different information but again I'm being forced into moves I don't want to do. I'm considering if this kind of FPL (where price changes are king) is something I want to play in future.
I understand the adjustments and strategically I can see what to do and what advantages there are to be had, but it's just unbalanced (to me anyway) at the moment. I'm not sure that I want to play a markets game with a football element.Weisenwolf wrote:It's an adjustment you can assimilate with ease IMHI. Bit of a bigger it's not apparent until mid seasoning and a shame FPL towers can't give us the heads up but hey-ho. It makes taking hits more likely and I wonder how good or bad that is?Mav3rick wrote:eff price drops - 99% to a drop now.
Would like time to think, and address issues next week with different information but again I'm being forced into moves I don't want to do. I'm considering if this kind of FPL (where price changes are king) is something I want to play in future.
