Yes, that's much better.
Sorry, we were just trying to be clear. I do see what you are trying to say - but over the years, English has become quite lazy, and people rarely say precisely what they mean, so the (often imprecise) colloquial expressions come to mean something slightly different commonly than perhaps you or I would like them to. Most people reading what you wrote originally would take it to mean that the expectation is that Hazard will not start - I know that's not what you meant, but I expect that's how most people would interpret it.
As a slight aside, I was mortified a couple of years ago when I discovered that the word 'literally' was to have a new definition in the dictionary, a meaning which means the precise opposite of it's traditional meaning (!) So after all these years of saying to people "No, you didn't literally laugh your head off" etc, I now have to accept that they have won, they can now use 'literally' as they wish. I queried how the dictionary could possibly change the rules like this, and a colleague explained to me that the dictionary is not a set of rules to be followed on how we
should use language, but rather simply a report on how we
do use language. Which was a real eye-opener for me.
So no offence intended.
Back on topic, I don't want to jinx Hazard (as I'm keeping him definitely), but this season 9 times out of 10 when a player has been doubtful, he's ended up playing. (It's the ones who miss out completely unexpectedly that have been the problem!)