Transfers GW38
- Willij5
- FISOhead
- Posts: 586
- Joined: 21 Aug 2013, 17:34
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Probably Carroll and Willian to Kane and tadic.
Annoyed I spend 3 points on taking Kane out for carrol last week.
Annoyed I spend 3 points on taking Kane out for carrol last week.
-
- FISOhead
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 22:28
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
which arse def out of Kos/Monreal/Gabriel? With Willian a doubt, is it worth shipping him for Mane/Tadic or some Arse player for a hit? i have a 100pt lead in my mini league so there's little to play for. I'm sitting at 2,189 pts so there's zero hope of breaking 3k this year.
- scarletjim
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 6908
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:32
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Spot on as usual, and the way you explain such things is so clear and easy to understand (I expect the bookie-related background probably helps...) - cheers.Ruth_NZ wrote:Because you only have one game for the hit to pay off in. Pretty simple really.Gambit wrote:Why? I wouldn't do the goalkeeper change as even if you get the clean sheet (which looks likely) it only cancels out the -4, but surely a striker change can pay off?Ruth_NZ wrote:GW38 is the worst conceivable time to take an unnecessary hit.
Most people will already have mini leagues that are pretty much finished (either won or too far behind) so a final day punt is not necessarily a bad thing, you could also argue that as there is no GW39 you don't need to look at up coming fixtures as you normally do at any other point, it's purely based on one game.
Taking a hit for a striker or midfielder you think could score heavy is always worth considering whether it be GW9 or GW38, I don't think GW38 is the worst conceivable time to take a hit, and for those chasing it's probably essential if they want to get a key attacking player(s) they are missing.
If it's a striker, their first goal pays for the hit. They have to score two (or a goal and assist) before you even have a chance of coming out ahead. The bookies rate Aguero's chance of a brace at no better then 20%. That means an 80% chance that your hit is neutral/negative even for Aguero.
Please note, however, that I said unnecessary. If you can't field 11, if you have no GK, if you intend to captain the player you are taking a hit to get, if you are leading a ML and want to block a rival's differential, in those circumstances the balance can shift. But in general it can't be a value bet.
The other circumstances you mention amount to having nothing to play for and just wanting to go out in style. Nothing wrong with that of course.
- scarletjim
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 6908
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:32
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
If money is no object, and you've nothing to really risk, I'd expect Kos would be the most likely to sneak a goal.slyger wrote:which arse def out of Kos/Monreal/Gabriel? With Willian a doubt, is it worth shipping him for Mane/Tadic or some Arse player for a hit? i have a 100pt lead in my mini league so there's little to play for. I'm sitting at 2,189 pts so there's zero hope of breaking 3k this year.
As fro Willian, well who will come in from your bench if he doesn't play? If you're worried about him getting a 1 point cameo, then I guess you need to be comparing Mane / Tadic -4 points to the likely total of whoever you could play in Willian's place from your existing squad...
-
- FISOhead
- Posts: 783
- Joined: 08 Jan 2008, 22:28
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
PVA would come in for Willian, with a def of Smalling, AZI, Arse def if that's the switch i make. Alternatively, i play PVA bench Cresswell and instead put in Mane/Tadic for Willian.scarletjim wrote:If money is no object, and you've nothing to really risk, I'd expect Kos would be the most likely to sneak a goal.slyger wrote:which arse def out of Kos/Monreal/Gabriel? With Willian a doubt, is it worth shipping him for Mane/Tadic or some Arse player for a hit? i have a 100pt lead in my mini league so there's little to play for. I'm sitting at 2,189 pts so there's zero hope of breaking 3k this year.
As fro Willian, well who will come in from your bench if he doesn't play? If you're worried about him getting a 1 point cameo, then I guess you need to be comparing Mane / Tadic -4 points to the likely total of whoever you could play in Willian's place from your existing squad...
- Bixer
- FISOhead
- Posts: 791
- Joined: 14 Dec 2015, 09:37
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Anyone else tempted to just leave their team as is?
I've got 3 Arsenal players, 3 United players and Aguero (among others, of course)
There are no other standout teams worth punting on as far as I can see.
The only thing really still up for grabs is 4th place, all other games are essentially end of season dead-rubbers, meaning which teams even bother to give 50% is anyone's guess.
Talk of Southampton players being a good bet, but is there any concrete evidence that Palace will be playing a weakened team? Considering they'll have a 6 day wait until the FA Cup final - they don't really have any need to rest anyone. If anything it'd behoove them to play a strong team to get some momentum going.
I might just stay put.
I've got 3 Arsenal players, 3 United players and Aguero (among others, of course)
There are no other standout teams worth punting on as far as I can see.
The only thing really still up for grabs is 4th place, all other games are essentially end of season dead-rubbers, meaning which teams even bother to give 50% is anyone's guess.
Talk of Southampton players being a good bet, but is there any concrete evidence that Palace will be playing a weakened team? Considering they'll have a 6 day wait until the FA Cup final - they don't really have any need to rest anyone. If anything it'd behoove them to play a strong team to get some momentum going.
I might just stay put.
- tommyk7
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 3362
- Joined: 05 Aug 2009, 20:14
- Location: New York City
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
I decided against a hit and went with Mignolet Forster.
Hoping Ozil either starts or plays 0.
Hoping Ozil either starts or plays 0.
- Ruth_NZ
- Grumpy Old Gorilla
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Shame it's not Lukaku instead of Giroud, now that would really be going out in style. Especially if you captained him. Which I am toying with doing myself by the way.Notned wrote:I found this sentence very useful, in that it encouraged me to go balls to the wall and see where it takes me;Ruth_NZ wrote: The other circumstances you mention amount to having nothing to play for and just wanting to go out in style. Nothing wrong with that of course.
Firmino Sanchez
Costa Giroud
Townsend Mane
Will captain one of the incoming three, just for that little extra bit of justification
- scarletjim
- Dumbledore
- Posts: 6908
- Joined: 13 Oct 2005, 18:32
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
If you had a spare free, I'd quite like that latter idea. As it is, PVA v Tadiv/Mane -4 is a tough call...slyger wrote:PVA would come in for Willian, with a def of Smalling, AZI, Arse def if that's the switch i make. Alternatively, i play PVA bench Cresswell and instead put in Mane/Tadic for Willian.scarletjim wrote:If money is no object, and you've nothing to really risk, I'd expect Kos would be the most likely to sneak a goal.slyger wrote:which arse def out of Kos/Monreal/Gabriel? With Willian a doubt, is it worth shipping him for Mane/Tadic or some Arse player for a hit? i have a 100pt lead in my mini league so there's little to play for. I'm sitting at 2,189 pts so there's zero hope of breaking 3k this year.
As fro Willian, well who will come in from your bench if he doesn't play? If you're worried about him getting a 1 point cameo, then I guess you need to be comparing Mane / Tadic -4 points to the likely total of whoever you could play in Willian's place from your existing squad...
-
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 11198
- Joined: 13 Sep 2013, 12:30
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
I was very tempted! Turns out I'm not quite as brave as I thought I was, but I genuinely think he could haul. You have my full backing to be the bigger manRuth_NZ wrote:Shame it's not Lukaku instead of Giroud, now that would really be going out in style. Especially if you captained him. Which I am toying with doing myself by the way.Notned wrote:I found this sentence very useful, in that it encouraged me to go balls to the wall and see where it takes me;Ruth_NZ wrote: The other circumstances you mention amount to having nothing to play for and just wanting to go out in style. Nothing wrong with that of course.
Firmino Sanchez
Costa Giroud
Townsend Mane
Will captain one of the incoming three, just for that little extra bit of justification
- Ruth_NZ
- Grumpy Old Gorilla
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Southampton want to nail the European spot don't they? Koeman thinks they have something to play for anyway.Bixer wrote:There are no other standout teams worth punting on as far as I can see.
Talk of Southampton players being a good bet, but is there any concrete evidence that Palace will be playing a weakened team? Considering they'll have a 6 day wait until the FA Cup final - they don't really have any need to rest anyone. If anything it'd behoove them to play a strong team to get some momentum going.
I might just stay put.
Pardew has indicated that he'll play Speroni. Whether he rests others is open to question but the Palace website says:
Pardew isn’t taking the encounter on the south coast lightly, but admits that he has to take the final against Manchester United into account with Palace hoping to claim a first ever piece of major silverware. At his pre-match press conference, he said: “I’ve got one eye on the cup final because we’ve got a chance to make history at this club and I’m very much aware of that..."
http://www.cpfc.co.uk/news/article/alan ... 12018.aspx
Whatever happens the Palace players will also have one eye on the cup final in 6 days time. I think Southampton players - Forster, VVD, Bertrand, Tadic, Mané, Long - are pretty good bets for GW38 myself.
- Ruth_NZ
- Grumpy Old Gorilla
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Thank you!Notned wrote:I was very tempted! Turns out I'm not quite as brave as I thought I was, but I genuinely think he could haul. You have my full backing to be the bigger manRuth_NZ wrote:Shame it's not Lukaku instead of Giroud, now that would really be going out in style. Especially if you captained him. Which I am toying with doing myself by the way.Notned wrote:I found this sentence very useful, in that it encouraged me to go balls to the wall and see where it takes me;Ruth_NZ wrote: The other circumstances you mention amount to having nothing to play for and just wanting to go out in style. Nothing wrong with that of course.
Firmino Sanchez
Costa Giroud
Townsend Mane
Will captain one of the incoming three, just for that little extra bit of justification
Thing is, I am 11 points inside the top 5k and would quite like to stay there. Do I really need a Lukaku(c) punt when he'll be quite a differential in the top 5k anyway? If it was GW18 rather than GW38 I'd just captain whoever I thought was the best bet. This week I may err on the side of caution. We'll see, I won't make my transfer(s) till tomorrow.
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 3227
- Joined: 17 May 2006, 00:27
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Firminio to Hazard
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 3427
- Joined: 02 Nov 2014, 16:36
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Fair enough Ruth, but if your striker scores then they have a chance of the bonus points which would also put you ahead? not looking to argue with you and I did miss your point of "unnecessary", I suppose everybody has got a different opinion of what unnecessary is. Looking at some of the proposed transfer hits on here and they look sound to me, taking out attacking players with either tough games or threat of reduced minutes for players with plum fixtures is not to be sniffed at, even if it is GW38. I'd say it's better to do it in GW38 because it is only one game, you wouldn't take out somebody mid season just because they may be benched for a single match, but on the last GW, with numerous players looking to have great fixtures......why notRuth_NZ wrote:Because you only have one game for the hit to pay off in. Pretty simple really.Gambit wrote:Why? I wouldn't do the goalkeeper change as even if you get the clean sheet (which looks likely) it only cancels out the -4, but surely a striker change can pay off?Ruth_NZ wrote:GW38 is the worst conceivable time to take an unnecessary hit.
Most people will already have mini leagues that are pretty much finished (either won or too far behind) so a final day punt is not necessarily a bad thing, you could also argue that as there is no GW39 you don't need to look at up coming fixtures as you normally do at any other point, it's purely based on one game.
Taking a hit for a striker or midfielder you think could score heavy is always worth considering whether it be GW9 or GW38, I don't think GW38 is the worst conceivable time to take a hit, and for those chasing it's probably essential if they want to get a key attacking player(s) they are missing.
If it's a striker, their first goal pays for the hit. They have to score two (or a goal and assist) before you even have a chance of coming out ahead. The bookies rate Aguero's chance of a brace at no better then 20%. That means an 80% chance that your hit is neutral/negative even for Aguero.
Please note, however, that I said unnecessary. If you can't field 11, if you have no GK, if you intend to captain the player you are taking a hit to get, if you are leading a ML and want to block a rival's differential, in those circumstances the balance can shift. But in general it can't be a value bet.
The other circumstances you mention amount to having nothing to play for and just wanting to go out in style. Nothing wrong with that of course.
- Ruth_NZ
- Grumpy Old Gorilla
- Posts: 9156
- Joined: 25 May 2015, 22:46
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
That's what I'd do and play AOA with Cresswell who is fine. Maybe Eriksen rather than Özil seeing you already have Sanchez.MoSe wrote:No Hit: Firmino Ozil (Eriksen)
Yep. But you also have to consider that the player you remove may be scoring points too.Gambit wrote:Fair enough Ruth, but if your striker scores then they have a chance of the bonus points which would also put you ahead?
GW38 hits really are different. At any other time when you take a hit for a player you'd be wanting to get anyway you are buying yourself a future FT. In GW38 the calculation strictly rests on that 1 week's games.
- Joccki_10
- Grumpy Old Joker
- Posts: 11429
- Joined: 26 Dec 2015, 11:20
- FS Record: 16/17: 55 OR, 1 FISO Forum, 1 NLD and FISO Cup Winner
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
You value both of Giroud and Lukaku over Long?Notned wrote:Finding it surprisingly hard to choose between Giroud and Lukaku for one of the moves though!
- huey
- Red & Blue Braces
- Posts: 311
- Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 11:12
Re: Transfers GW38
At long last, I've reached the top of my league, but by a very slender margin. The consensus seems to be that Mignolet will be rested.
With Mignolet and Darlow, what would you do:
a) Mignolet Cech ?
or
b) Mignolet de Gea and Carroll Giroud (-4) ?
(Rival has de Gea)
With Mignolet and Darlow, what would you do:
a) Mignolet Cech ?
or
b) Mignolet de Gea and Carroll Giroud (-4) ?
(Rival has de Gea)
- Smurphy Paw
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 14515
- Joined: 17 Aug 2006, 17:48
- FS Record: Mediocre, apparently
13/14: FPL 1792; FIFA 14 Top 700.
17/18: FPL 696th; loads of mini-League wins and side game promotions
18/19 1FC Köln 5AS Champions
#1 Spring Super League regular season 19/20 & 20/21 - FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
As Darlow is likely to play... play him. Expected points, say 2.huey wrote:At long last, I've reached the top of my league, but by a very slender margin. The consensus seems to be that Mignolet will be rested.
With Mignolet and Darlow, what would you do:
a) Mignolet Cech ?
or
b) Mignolet de Gea and Carroll Giroud (-4) ?
(Rival has de Gea)
De Gea may get 6(-4)=2. Or he may concede
Best you can do taking a hit for a certain starting goalkeeper is break even
(Save points, penalties assumed to be roughly even, but unlikely to be 4 points swing's worth like a hit or goal conceded)
- huey
- Red & Blue Braces
- Posts: 311
- Joined: 03 Jan 2008, 11:12
Re: Transfers GW38
You're right dammit. I just wish I could try harder somehow, but conservative seems to be the way to play this.Smurphy's Paw wrote:As Darlow is likely to play... play him. Expected points, say 2.huey wrote:At long last, I've reached the top of my league, but by a very slender margin. The consensus seems to be that Mignolet will be rested.
With Mignolet and Darlow, what would you do:
a) Mignolet Cech ?
or
b) Mignolet de Gea and Carroll Giroud (-4) ?
(Rival has de Gea)
De Gea may get 6(-4)=2. Or he may concede
Best you can do taking a hit for a certain starting goalkeeper is break even
(Save points, penalties assumed to be roughly even, but unlikely to be 4 points swing's worth like a hit or goal conceded)
-
- FISOhead
- Posts: 795
- Joined: 13 Sep 2015, 22:10
- FS Record: 4-1
Re: Transfers GW38
You think so?Ruth_NZ wrote:Neither. GW38 is the worst conceivable time to take an unnecessary hit.payetme wrote:I already did Firmino>TadicRuth_NZ wrote:Actually that's what I imagine I will do. I was set on Firmino Özil but I will probably do Robles Cech and Firmino Tadic for a hit.
Now would you do Caroll>Vardy or Darlow> De gea for a -4?
I feel like i want to be spontaneous and take a hit anyways. Vardy chasing the golden boot sounds enticing .
-
- FISOhead
- Posts: 795
- Joined: 13 Sep 2015, 22:10
- FS Record: 4-1
Re: Transfers GW38
Yeah, I'm leading one of my ML's by 40+ pts. My other ML I'm about 20 points off top 10, I really never thought I was in contention to finish top 10(top 10 get paid) but I am, I think Vardy might be a nice differential for non dead teams who stayed competitive with the DGW's.
Just looking to shake it up a bit and have fun on the last matchday.
Just looking to shake it up a bit and have fun on the last matchday.
- Cantonascollar1
- Kevin and Perry
- Posts: 40
- Joined: 28 Aug 2015, 22:40
Re: Transfers GW38
I'm currently second in ML and 41 points adrift from top spot! I've still got AOA chip to play...
My team
Robles Darlow Bellerin Sakho Smalling Kirchoff Simpson KDB Sanchez Payet Fabregss Milner Defoe Carroll Aguero
0.7 mill in the bank.
Top spot rival in ML has:
Schmeichel Robles Simpson Gabriel Rojo Kirchoff lovren Coutinho Sanchez Payet king Hazard
Carroll martial Defoe
1ft
Should I do....
A) Milner and Defoe to Tadic and Long and play AOA - 4 and play Smalling Bellerin at the back.
OR
B) Milner to Tadic and play 3 at the back.
And captain Aguero/Tadic over Sanchez as he doesn't have him?
Long shot trying to catch him, but worth a shot.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Thanks
My team
Robles Darlow Bellerin Sakho Smalling Kirchoff Simpson KDB Sanchez Payet Fabregss Milner Defoe Carroll Aguero
0.7 mill in the bank.
Top spot rival in ML has:
Schmeichel Robles Simpson Gabriel Rojo Kirchoff lovren Coutinho Sanchez Payet king Hazard
Carroll martial Defoe
1ft
Should I do....
A) Milner and Defoe to Tadic and Long and play AOA - 4 and play Smalling Bellerin at the back.
OR
B) Milner to Tadic and play 3 at the back.
And captain Aguero/Tadic over Sanchez as he doesn't have him?
Long shot trying to catch him, but worth a shot.
Any help would be much appreciated!
Thanks
-
- Red & Blue Braces
- Posts: 425
- Joined: 12 Mar 2007, 21:45
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
18 points off league leader having made up around 80 the last 5 weeks...decision time now.
I'm mainly looking to field 11 starters however this week with Fosu, Huth, Firm, Defoe and Lovern all ranging from banned to unlikely to play. Also have Iwobi and maybe even Carroll likely for 1 and 2 points respectively...
I'm looking at the possibility of a 4 point hit with Lovern and Firm out for Kos and Tadic in as Arsenal look the best bet for a clean sheet (+2 on a non playing defender) and Tadic my favoured midfield target for points this week.
This would leave me with a front 8 of
Sanchez Hazard Payet Tadic Iwobi and Carroll Aguero
With 3 playing defenders. The general concensus being 11 players -4 points stand a better chance than 10 players...does this sound feasible and would anyone suggest maybe Defoe to Vardy and dropping Iwobi (possible 2 points) could be a decisive extra switch or should I hold tight and hope Defoe gets minutes/Iwobi gets something?
18 points is not impossible to make up and I'd prefer to go for first and end in third then consolidate against the team 10 points behind me.
I'm mainly looking to field 11 starters however this week with Fosu, Huth, Firm, Defoe and Lovern all ranging from banned to unlikely to play. Also have Iwobi and maybe even Carroll likely for 1 and 2 points respectively...
I'm looking at the possibility of a 4 point hit with Lovern and Firm out for Kos and Tadic in as Arsenal look the best bet for a clean sheet (+2 on a non playing defender) and Tadic my favoured midfield target for points this week.
This would leave me with a front 8 of
Sanchez Hazard Payet Tadic Iwobi and Carroll Aguero
With 3 playing defenders. The general concensus being 11 players -4 points stand a better chance than 10 players...does this sound feasible and would anyone suggest maybe Defoe to Vardy and dropping Iwobi (possible 2 points) could be a decisive extra switch or should I hold tight and hope Defoe gets minutes/Iwobi gets something?
18 points is not impossible to make up and I'd prefer to go for first and end in third then consolidate against the team 10 points behind me.
-
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 11198
- Joined: 13 Sep 2013, 12:30
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
I like Long too, but I brought in Mane so wouldn't want to double up. I think I'd prefer Giroud or Lukaku anyway just about, but Long is also a good shout.Joccki_10 wrote:You value both of Giroud and Lukaku over Long?Notned wrote:Finding it surprisingly hard to choose between Giroud and Lukaku for one of the moves though!
- Geri
- Red & Blue Braces
- Posts: 367
- Joined: 22 Oct 2015, 19:32
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
If money was no matter who would be better Kane or Giroud?
I'm leaning towards Kane but Giroud plays Villa at home.
I'm leaning towards Kane but Giroud plays Villa at home.
-
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 11198
- Joined: 13 Sep 2013, 12:30
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Tough one that! Kane is chasing the golden boot up against a deflated Newcastle side with nothing to play for, whereas Giroud faces a Villa side who are notorious for not being able to defend crosses and deal with an aerial threat. Bit of a coin toss that one, and not a decision I'd liked to have to make!Geri wrote:If money was no matter who would be better Kane or Giroud?
I'm leaning towards Kane but Giroud plays Villa at home.
Edit; although I should add something is tempting me to captain Giroud (I have both), make of that what you will.
-
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 3427
- Joined: 02 Nov 2014, 16:36
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Giroud because he is facing Villa and I can see Arsenal scoring 4 or 5
- MPTree
- Grumpy Old Man
- Posts: 2008
- Joined: 13 Oct 2013, 13:44
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Just out of interest, why Mané over Tadic? I have a minor Tadic/Mané dilemma myself. Like Tadic's set pieces (and first choice pens, right?), but also like Mané's explosiveness and very occasional hat tricks.Notned wrote:I like Long too, but I brought in Mane so wouldn't want to double up. I think I'd prefer Giroud or Lukaku anyway just about, but Long is also a good shout.Joccki_10 wrote:You value both of Giroud and Lukaku over Long?Notned wrote:Finding it surprisingly hard to choose between Giroud and Lukaku for one of the moves though!
-
- FISO Knight
- Posts: 11198
- Joined: 13 Sep 2013, 12:30
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Honestly? I think I was swayed by the fact most are bringing in Tadic, and fancied a bit of a differential. He's probably more explosive but less consistent, so just feels a bit more fun (if risky, which often comes hand in hand) for a final day move.MPTree wrote:Just out of interest, why Mané over Tadic? I have a minor Tadic/Mané dilemma myself. Like Tadic's set pieces (and first choice pens, right?), but also like Mané's explosiveness and very occasional hat tricks.Notned wrote:I like Long too, but I brought in Mane so wouldn't want to double up. I think I'd prefer Giroud or Lukaku anyway just about, but Long is also a good shout.Joccki_10 wrote:You value both of Giroud and Lukaku over Long?Notned wrote:Finding it surprisingly hard to choose between Giroud and Lukaku for one of the moves though!
- Joccki_10
- Grumpy Old Joker
- Posts: 11429
- Joined: 26 Dec 2015, 11:20
- FS Record: 16/17: 55 OR, 1 FISO Forum, 1 NLD and FISO Cup Winner
- FPL:
Re: Transfers GW38
Cheers mate. Leaning towards Giroud but still not convinced about his game time. Will decide tomorrow morning.Notned wrote:I like Long too, but I brought in Mane so wouldn't want to double up. I think I'd prefer Giroud or Lukaku anyway just about, but Long is also a good shout.Joccki_10 wrote:You value both of Giroud and Lukaku over Long?Notned wrote:Finding it surprisingly hard to choose between Giroud and Lukaku for one of the moves though!
View Latest: 1 Day View Your posts